still from Matthew Barney's Cremaster 3

The Good Apprentice
by Kevin Reay

An in-depth look at Matthew Barney's Cremaster 3
This article originally appeared in the Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts (PAFA) Graduate Journal

In Cremaster 3, the final stage of the five-part Cremaster cycle, Matthew Barney has not only created a masterpiece of postmodern art but has also immortalised himself in film. The scale, ambition and sheer beauty of the finished work is breathtaking. Over the five films, Barney has articulated a personal mythology so richly detailed, so densely populated and so carefully sculpted that to imagine undertaking such a project is daunting, even after witnessing it's completion. Michael Kimmelman wrote in the New York Times, "Barney is ultimately the most important American artist of his generation because his imagination is so big". It is testimony to the power of Barney's artistic vision that Cremaster 3, a film lasting 3 hours, that moves at a snails pace and is largely without dialogue can feel like a roller coaster ride of such intellectual intensity that once over you just want to see it again. Curator Nancy Spector claims that, "With the CREMASTER cycle, Barney is transcribing a new, post-Oedipal myth for our contemporary culture. His is a counter-narrative that depicts internal conflict rather than external mastery; it is an epic saga in which definition is defied and resolution deferred." Barney uses the breadth of cinematic expression to explore the complex subtleties and contradictions of creation and destruction, belief and non-belief and male identity and sexuality.

As his approach is that of an installation artist, Barney neatly sidesteps much that plagues cinematic endeavour. By creating the Cremaster cycle out of numerical order, for example, there is in no sense a sequel or remake. In fact, finishing the cycle with Cremaster 3, Barney takes us to the heart of his masterpiece, the central point that then folds in on itself making it simultaneously an end and a beginning. Auteur theory is simply dismissed, as it is clear from the onset that this is a work of art. Barney uses the grammar of cinema in a way that seems very natural to him. As Dave Kehr has written, "Barney has become a filmmaker in spite of himself." Barney explains, "It's grown out of documenting real-time performance," he continues, "That's how I started: creating these situations where a performance would happen around a network of objects, and a video camera was there basically just to document it. Slowly, I started having an interest in editing those documents, and the editing process got more and more exciting to me, to the point where it started becoming about storytelling." (Kehr). Cremaster 3 makes some allusions to cinema and has been compared in reviews to Star Wars, Evil Dead 2, the Carry-on comedies of the seventies, gangster films and the ornate work of Peter Greenaway. I feel that Barney is not a devotee of cinema; therefore he is not a slave to its conventions. There are maybe elements of Cronenberg or Lynch but Barney seems much more comfortable discussing ESPN. He explains, "A lot of these angles … are really about trying to mimic broadcast sports angles in order to anchor the scene, to sort of normalize it before it becomes abstracted." Barney described his films as moving at the speed of art, i.e. slowly and functioning in a way similar to sculpture that requires the viewer to move around it to understand it, and to visit it repeatedly. Thus, Barney sets out to make art with what cinema has to offer as a medium and he as an artist pushes at the limits of both cinema and art in a way that no other contemporary artist has done.

Attending Yale on a football scholarship, Barney supported himself by trading on his boyish good looks. He worked as a model, most notably for the Gap. Born in 1967 in San Francisco but brought up in Boise Idaho, Barney has been characterised as the all-American guy-- athletic, attractive and intelligent. Ivy League football may not be the average background for an artist but the experience was not without its value. As Barney points out, "I was a quarterback, I'm very comfortable working on a single thing with a group of people." Cremaster 3 is prefaced with a quote from Vince Lombardi, giant of American football and architect of the modern game, who said, "Character … is the integration of habits of conduct superimposed on temperament. Will is character in action." (Wakefield). Instead of pursuing a career as a professional athlete, Barney studied medicine and this explains, "something of the precision of his invented anatomies and the anatomical title of his … Cremaster series. The cremaster is the muscle in the male genitals from which the testicles are suspended (and which retracts them in cold or fear)."(Eyestorm). In Cremaster, Barney crossbreeds elements of personal history with seemingly disparate strands of contemporary culture, identifies the necessary characteristics and then gives life to the hybrid form. Barney says of Cremaster, "I've always thought of the project as a sort of sexually driven digestive system, that it was a consumer and a producer of matter. And it is desire driven, rather than driven by hunger or anything like that. It's a desire in the sense of a kind of sexual desire. He says he has, "an interest in creating a kind of internal system. So those sorts of biological systems are really useful to look at. Literal systems that exist have their own sets of logic and their own sorts of pressures and conflicts."

Barney sees himself as an abstract artist and this is evident in the details of the sculptural pieces in Cremaster. He explains, "I think a lot of the references I make to American traditions - whether it's athletics or a kind of car culture - I think those are things that I've certainly grown up with and understand. It makes those things very available to me to use, and I consider them as kinds of vessels. I don't think that by the time they've been hashed through the project they're representative of what they necessarily are in everyday life." There is a fetishistic attention paid to material, shape and form. His manipulation of substances such as Vaseline, wax and self-healing plastic shows sensitivity to media similar to Beuys' use of felt or fat and Robert Gober's use of porcelain and beeswax. A particularly visually stunning vignette in Cremaster 3 sees the paralympian and double-amputee Aimee Mullins with prosthetic plexiglass legs using a specially designed heel to cut potatoes into pentagonal wedges. Mullins, a character who reappears in several guises, plays the Moll and is referred to as the Entered Novitiate. As Stephen Holden writes, "If any modern athlete incarnates the will to overcome the seemingly impossible, it is certainly Ms. Mullins who presides over the movie like an ominous muse." In a replica of the Art Deco lobby of New York's Chrysler Building, one 1930 Chrysler Imperial New Yorker is loaded with the body of the executed Gary Gilmore - a central character from Cremaster 2. The car is then ritualistically crushed by five 1967 Chrysler Crown Imperials, "five cars orbit their prey. Without warning the bleeding red tail light and glint of steel and chrome carries the full force of a punch as the progenitor Imperial is pushed backwards into the elevator bay and systematically punished. Choreographed as if to the deadly eroticism of a bullfight, the escalating impact of the machines compacts the once stately vehicle into the shape of a dental implant."(Wakefield). With this Barney connects many of the strands of Cremaster into one explosive spectacle, pent-up pressure and tension is unleashed as aggression and violence.

Architecture and location are important elements in Cremaster 3. We are transported from the natural phenomenon of the Giant's Causeway in Northern Ireland, to the modern marvel of the Chrysler Building in the 30's and finally the Guggenheim Museum in New York. Throughout Cremaster, Barney uses conceptual devices to site his work and recalls the land art of Christo, Smithson and Long. His use of architectural space is reminiscent of Matta-Clark or Rachel Whiteread. In Cremaster 3 the interior of the Chrysler building is perverted in the production of a huge stringed musical instrument, perhaps a Celtic harp for a Northern Irish giant. As the central motif, the Chrysler Building, represents much at the core of the work. It's man's mastery over nature, "an epic paean to a vertical empire predicated on lateral mobility."(Wakefield). It's a steel phallus and in Barney's mind the personification and setting for the struggle between the Great Architect, played by the sculptor Richard Serra, and The Entered Apprentice, played by himself. Serra's character in Cremaster 3 is complicated. As Barney explains, "The story has primarily to do with the construction of the Chrysler tower. And, as the Architect is described, it starts overlapping with the mythology of the Freemasons. Hiram Abiff, the architect of Solomon's Temple, is the martyr in Freemasonry-- he was killed by corrupt stonemasons who worked beneath him. They believed he knew the name of God and they wanted to be told the name of God. Hiram wouldn't tell them so he was killed by a plumb and a level to the temple and a maul to the forehead. So "CREMASTER 3" starts to fold into some of the mythologies of Freemasonry that way. Richard Serra's character, the Architect, becomes like Hiram at a certain point. The Chrysler tower is actually never completed in the same way that the Temple of Solomon is never completed." The relationship between Barney as the Mason's apprentice, and Serra as the Grand Architect is one of father and son and is fraught with the dark complexity of masculinity and male sexuality. "For Georges Bataille, Oedipal tensions between father and son were part of a chain of symbolic linkage that connects the Ancient Tower of Babel to the priapic ambitions of the modern skyscraper: 'We find here an attempt to climb the sky - that is to say, to dethrone the father, to possess oneself of his virility - followed by the destruction of the rebels; castration of the son by his father, whose rival he is."(Wakefield). This battle of wills reaches a strange and dreamlike zenith in a former dental lab on the 71st floor, where the Entered Apprentice is castrated and Grand Architect forces, "the remains of the compacted Imperial into his mutilated mouth and shitting out his own teeth leaves little doubt as to the severity of phallic retribution." (Wakefield). With this act the Architect and the architecture become indivisible from each other, the unfinished building becomes a mausoleum for the Architect sealed off in its great spire. In the finale staged in the Guggenheim the Entered Apprentice freed from the responsibility of his work and the struggle of wills becomes a comic faery-like character moving between the structure's levels like a character in a computer game. Serra on Level Five is doomed to the repetitive motion of hurling hot Vaseline in exactly the same way he had done with molten lead earlier in his career. Cremaster 3 like all great art, poses more questions than it answers and offers no resolution or redemption, instead it reflects back the confusing and mystifying void that is life and death, the very void that most cinema seeks to fill.

Barney, Matthew. Cremaster 3. PBS Television, 2002.
Eyestorm Editorial Staff, Matthew Barney. Eyestorm online magazine, 2002.
Holden, Stephen. Racing Dead Horses. Dental Torture. The Usual. New York Times, 2002.
Kehr, Dave. Cremaster' Is a Wrap. New York Times, 2002.
Kimmelman, Michael. The Importance of Matthew Barney. New York Times, 1999
Spector, Nancy. Matthew Barney: The Cremaster Cycle. Guggenheim Press Release, 2002.
Wakefield, Neville. The Passenger. Issue 67. Frieze, 2002.


About the Writer

Kevin Reay (b. 1971 in England U.K.) studied painting at Glasgow School of Art in Scotland and participated in an exchange program with Tyler School of Art in Philadelphia. He opened pogo, a short-lived project space for cutting-edge installation art in the summer of 2001 in the Old City section of Philadelphia. The pogo project continues as a virtual exhibition space and e-zine and can be found at pogozine.net. He recently co-curated, 'NewHormones' a group show of new work by students from Tyler School of Art that took place in domestic spaces in Philadelphia. He also took part in 'InLiquid Investigates: Artists Outside the Box', a roundtable discussion about the role of artist/curators in Philadelphia. Reay lives and works in Philadelphia and took part in In:View as part of this year's Fringe Festival, a recent solo show at Project Room, and will have a solo show at Nexus' Community Gallery in spring 2003. He delivered a lecture on the artist Matthew Barney as part of the PAFA 'Art at Lunch' series in January 2003.

© 2002 Kevin Reay and PAFA Graduate Journal; image copyright © Matthew Barney
For any questions regarding this publication, please call 215-972-2071 or email Tamara@pafa.org
 
 


 

022ls