|
In
the current period of constantly shifting theories in art, the
emergence of an artist whose vision is highly individualistic
is a refreshing occurrence. Carl Affarian's paintings and sculptures
exist outside the convoluted paradigms which occupy and confuse
the art world's consciousness. Affarian's knowledge of art history
and theory is thorough and it is precisely this comprehensive
understanding which has brought him to the realization that an
artist should not speak from anyone else's point of view. In his
educational background, Affarian has acknowledged and worked within
the parameters of Conceptual art and performance. This experience
has led him back to painting and the making of objects with a
new determination. He defines his approach as a process of growth
through elimination and subtraction. His judicious removal of
excessive elements and obsolete references allows his work to
encounter the audience with conviction. The new work is unfettered
by trend and temporality. There is a rarefied spiritual quality
to the work which is reactionary to a prevalent nihilistic thread
in contemporary art.
Affarian does not adhere to any constrictive
rules or preconceptions about how to make art; instead he works
from his daily interpretations of the world as he strives to generate
new thought. These pieces employ a strong visual capability to
convey various meanings to the viewer. Perhaps Affarian's work
challenges rather than alienates the audience because it evolves
from positive motivations. He does not view the studio as an abandoned
ruin of an outmoded, era. Indeed, Affarian's works are wonderfully
evocative documents of his personal discoveries made through a
creative process which he enjoys. For there is no doubt that creating
art objects is a vital activity which provides him with artistic
transformation through learning. One such crucial discovery which
has influenced the recent direction in Affarian's work is the
obsolescence of the image. Over a period of time, Affarian has
observed a gradual disintegration of the image in his art, an
absence which has made the essence of the pieces much more explicit.
The new works are more focused and uncompromising as they demonstrate
a lucid intuition enhanced by a refined formalistic vision. The
more uncluttered the pieces are, the more precise the messages
become. This nonspecificity precedes a more intensive level of
clarity.
Affarian believes in a necessary gestalt between
the viewer and the art object, a friction generated by chance
through changes of time, place and context in the display of the
art. The paintings and sculptures are dependent upon subjective
viewer response to elicit a nonverbal meaning. He views these
pieces as nouns engaged in a relationship with the viewer, who
assumes the role of verb/activator in constructing a narrative.
The artist also maintains a great deal of control over how his
works are installed in a particular show. This deliberate orchestration
of how the objects are placed in a viewing space dictates an abstracted
narrative structure which is never didactic or literal. Affarian's
choices made in the studio and in the installation process insure
the presence of a distinguishable metaphorical quality. The new
paintings are indicative of his firm belief in the efficacy of
intuition, risk and the element of chance to add a new dimension
to the art in accordance with the context of the exhibition.
Affarian's commitment to his work is ethical
in nature, sustained by a romantic reasoning. The concentrated
simplicity of his new pieces forms the foundation for their metaphysical
qualities. He finds significance in organic history and credits
his own Orthodox Armenian Catholic heritage for his sense of responsibility
to excellence and craftsmanship. Affarian mines the source of
his background experiences which provides him with a purist approach
to his art. His conscientious evaluation of his relationship to
art history has helped him to define his position. He proves that
in the 1980's, an artist can still go back and reclaim a primary
consciousness, then filter these impressions through a contemporary
interpretation.
Specific works still allude to earlier themes:
the halo, the maelstrom, entrances and ellipses. Many of the new
paintings confirm the impact of stripping down the image to its
essence. In The Tempest individual components of gold gouache
and layers of varnish applied to plywood are arranged in a manner
which appears somewhat chaotic yet betrays a more formal grid
structure. The synthesis of Affarian's technical proficiency and
his certain faith in the power of chance allows various incongruities
to operate in service of the whole. These paintings function on
a level similar to a Rorschach test because there are no set guidelines
given to produce specific readings. Like the psychological test
images, these paintings are open to a multitude of interpretations.
Other works also possess a sensuous tactile quality. Affarian
applied fifty coats of permanent blue varnish on a surface of
plywood and plaster to create the haunting piece Heroin. The
result is stunning in its sublime strengths. In the finger painting
Pleasure, the title relates to the artist's instinctive
response to the visceral and involving process. The handmade marks
made with graphite, beeswax and gold gouache are visually enticing
and impose a viable and memorable presence. Here the artist's
gestures are transformed into a solid documentation of his existence
in the world, in an art historical context and in contemporary
culture. No amount of clinical detachment or pervasive dogma can
ever fully repress the artist's need to express a personal vision.
Affarian has absorbed the implications of art history's declarations
and developments. He understands the complexities of art and the
need for artists today to avoid dangerous entrenchment in exclusive
ideologies. As a result, Affarian, relying on his own strengths
and convictions, has liberated himself from debilitating strictures
to accept new challenges and reach his own conclusions.
Jude Schwendenwien
Read other essays
from the Lawrence Oliver Gallery
|