|
A Closer Look 3
Beaver College Art Gallery
January 12 - February 14, 1999
"Map me no maps, sir, my head is a map, a map of
the whole world." -Henry Fielding (1707-1754)
We humans have long charted, plotted, and diagramed the world around
us. The oldest existing map – a small clay tablet from Sumeria portraying
an estate – was made late in the third millennium B.C. This universal
process of mapmaking, of measuring and systemizing space, transforms
one set of visual information into another. I had been occupied
for some time by the artful manifestations of mapping in contemporary
art when Beaver College Art Gallery Director Richard Torchia asked
me to curate A Closer Look 3. After sifting through nearly
one-hundred dossiers, I created a short list of twelve artists.
I then determined that the nucleus of the group would be Perry Steindel,
an artist who has been making imaginary maps for the last thirty
years. His art led me to other artists who puzzle over the conceptual
terrain of thought and language. The group of seven I eventually
selected employ both serious and comic stategies to address the
ways people, animals, and plants mark and stake the landscape. "Maps are the vocabulary of passion that I speak," PERRY
STEINDEL wrote in 1992. Steindel supports himself as a
night staffer in a bank. On occasion he is obliged to wait for a
Iong printout to be cranked out by a large printer. In those moments
he may grab a piece of scrap computer paper he's stowed away for
the purpose and start a drawing of an imaginary coastline. To Steindel,
creating these delicate, lyrical markings is a privately spiritual
endeavor, as he takes the blank page and transforms it into a small,
graceful drawing. His usual tool is a ballpoint pen refill, which
is quite light in the hand; "like taking hold of a feather,
or flying in a dream," he says. Later he often salvages a part
of the spontaneous image and works on it until he's satisfied that
it is complete. In general, maps serve as intermediaries between
their maker, their users, and the environment. Steindel's cartographic
notations invite us to follow him into the territory of the mind's
eye.
The intimate, rebuslike paintings of SHARON HORVATH explore
the interpretive richness of diagrammatic markmaking. Horvath
is as much inspired by the layered density of primitive archeological
sites as she is by modern metro maps. In Heaven and Sea, which
appears to reference an electronic circuit as well as a body of
water, Horvath frames her central form with a zig-zagged edging
made by pinking shears. While Chronicle Paternal evokes
a target or radar screen, Emerald Necklace suggests a forest
from a bird's-eye view. Regarding the role of maps in her art, Horvath
recently stated: "'My paintings are maplike suggestions of
the physical and psychological energies that we call the self, and
at the same time, they are attempts at portraying a world always
shifting borders between inner and outer by which we recognize our
world and our selves,” One work on view, a humorous etching and
watercolor entitled Walking Map, contains images resembling
a tall shoe and peg leg. It evokes the "Walking Purchase,"
an ignoble moment in Pennsylvania history when, in 1737, the sons
of William Penn used a forged treaty to acquire territory from the
Delaware Indians. They chose an exceptionally fit man to establish
land boundaries loosely described as extending "as far as a
man can go in a day and a half."
In the English language, we talk about "reading" a map
as well as reading text. How is reading different from looking?
SUE PATTERSON charts the territory of language
through her linen cutwork lexicon mazes. Reflecting her current
focus on the written word, she creates Scrabble boardlike formations
of her own poems in the two works on view. In several instances,
these texts refer back to their own form and to our awareness of
the process of reading: "persons awaiting discovery may be
lost forever.... take the time for smaller problems." Snaking
around each rectilinear configuration of the machine-stitched text
is a loose, gestural track of stitches, worked by hand in thread
that glows in the dark.These patterns take the form of Porteus mazes,
named after the early twentieth-century Australian educator who
developed them as an educational testing tool. Each pattern documents
a given individual's series of "choice points" at important
times of transition. Patterson awakens us to the notion of the maze
as a map, recalling the way Ariadne helped Theseus escape the labyrinth
by laying down a thread to serve as his guide.
In three distinct but related works, YANE CALOVSKI employs
aerial views and elevations to symbolically deconstruct his family's
house, designed and built by his parents. Starting with accurate
architectural information, he maps the home and property, exploring
different aspects of looking by showing us the house plan in different
views and formats, including a masonite relief and two drawings
-- one on adjoined sheets of rice paper and the other on both sides
of a bar of Plexiglas. Precisely rendered, they not only suggest
the propositional attitude of blueprints and models, but also register
the structure as built, observed, inhabited, and adjusted. To the
artist, these works "represent the ephemeral nature of remembering.”
The specific dwelling, both documented and recollected, becomes
"the active monument of our lives." The text that inspired
these works is a poem entitled The house and its imperfections
by his father, the Macedonian poet and essayist Todor Calovski.
Regarding his own sculpture, Calovski has said: "There is nothing
perfect or absolute about any of these works; although they derive
from a specific source, they have become self-referential by speaking
of their own imperfections and transformations." AirpIanes
and their shadows appear in two of the pieces, as does a smaII car
that appears to exit the large rice paper drawing. Mimicking the
narrative of travel, these elements animate the works and confirm
the actuality of the house in relation to the world.
BILL SCANGA is represented by three works that
question context, including a miniature, well-appointed living room
inhabited by a mounted frog. Are we to understand that the creature
is in his own space, or is he an intruder? And what do we make of
the other frog in the tableau? Scanga's
droll sculpture leaves us with as many questions as answers.The
croaking sounds emerging from the loudspeakers are a link to the
creature's natural habitat, where sound is a way of marking territory.
High in the rafters of the gallery, beneath the sill of a small
elevated window, Scanga has carefully sited another mounted specimen
– a bird rocking suggestively back and forth on his perch. These
seemingly auto-erotic motions are not accompanied by birdsong but
by a vintage recording of tunes whistled by the legendary virtuoso
Fred Lowery. Scanga is not afraid of making his audience laugh with
his surreal juxtapositions of animal life and human appurtenances.
In another work, Ant, his amusing seven-minute videotape
inspired by other "'pioneering" animals as they intersect
with the manmade, Scanga documents the successful space flight of
a live insect traveling in a toy rocket.
Like Scanga, outdoor sculptor SUSAN CROWDER evokes
grave questions about the opposing territorial imperatives
of different species. Indigenous information often dictates the
form of Crowder's undertakings. Her favored materials are black
rubber hose, coated wire, and plastic netting used to protect plants
from grazing animals. When she employs conventional materials for
works on paper, Crowder enjoys delineating a dense, central image,
the edges of which she then fans or "smudges" into progressively
lighter tonal passages. She was delighted to discover that when
cut and bundled, the plastic netting allows her to replicate in
her sculpture the visual effect of her drawings. Ground Cover
is a dark horticultural surrogate animated with the sinister
will of hearty, invasive aliens. It expresses the random growth
of plant life as it literally blankets the floor. Glenside,
the column-based sculpture situated outside the gallery, is
surmounted by a bird's nest. Crowder translates its classic forms
back into the raw materials of trees. As such, it becomes a canny
time capsule, using the language of architecture as interpreted
in the late-eighteenth century, when people were interested in the
origins of the classical orders and took pleasure in the rustication
of forms. Primex, a large, ersatz hanging planter, takes
its name from the large garden supply store in Glenside.
The quasi-abstract canvases of GERALD NICHOLS reveal
his interest in mapmaking as a primary – but not the sole – tool
for capturing a "sense of place." In Nichols' semi-autobiographical
work, The Nighthawks, for example, we can discern the meandering
course of the Susquehanna River as it appears and disappears from
view. Nichols' use of geometry relates to what he refers to as "the
conceit of controlling the shape of the world" as seen by his
visual references to schema – for instance the configuration of
the Big Dipper or a stylized leaf designed by a nineteenth-century
American quilter. Institute for the Investigation of Winter,
the tongue-in-cheek title of one of Nichols' three paintings
on view, speaks to this unrealistic desire to quantify nature. Nichols
highlights a vintage Airstream trailer making its way across the
compositional circuitry. He succeeds masterfully here in conveying
the buttery potential of paint while humorously referencing the
archetypal green and red of the holiday season.
In his ancient volume Lives, the Greek biographer Plutarch
described the work of geographers who "crowd into the edges
of their maps part of the world which they do not know about, adding
notes in the margin to the effect that beyond this lies nothing
but sandy deserts full of wild beasts and unapproachable bogs."
Like Plutarchian geographers, the seven artists exhibiting in "A
Closer Look 3" pay homage both to what can and cannot be seen.
For most of us, it is a balance that is continually shifting.
Judith Stein, January 1999
Back to portal |